Answered

Which statement accurately contrasts the Ottoman and Safavid empires in the 16th century?

ASafavid rulers were Muslims who persecuted Hindus living within the empire, whereas Ottoman rulers practiced Sikhism, which shares some beliefs with both Hinduism and Islam.
BSafavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr, whereas Ottoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his son-in-law Ali.
COttoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr, whereas Safavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his son-in-law

Verified Answer :

Glauxeira

The Ottomans were primarily Sunni Muslims, who believed Abu Bakr should be the successor to Muhammad. The Safavids were Shi'ite Muslims, who believed that Ali should be thr successor. In short, the answer is C

Answer:

c. Ottoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr, whereas Safavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his son-in-law

Related Questions