Frankaylemuna
Answered

Which of the following best explains why secondary sources are important to historians?

AThey put historical events in the correct chronological order.
BThey are the least biased source available for any subject.
CThey summarize conclusions about primary sources.
DThey provide firsthand accounts of historical events.

Verified Answer :

"C. They summarize conclusions about primary sources" would be the best option from the list, since these sources differ from primary sources in that they are not "first-hand accounts". 

C. They summarize conclusions about primary sources.

Related Questions