In pea plants, purple flower color, $C$, is dominant to white flower color, $c$. The table shows the frequencies of the dominant and recessive alleles in three generations of peas in a garden.



\begin{table}

\captionsetup{labelformat=empty}

\caption{Allele Frequency for Flower Color in Peas}


Generation
$p$$q$

1
0.60.4

2
0.70.3

3
0.80.2




\end{table}



Which scientific question might these results cause a scientist to ask?


AWhich population most likely experienced a genetic mutation?
BWhy do some pea plants have purple flowers and others have white flowers?
CWould the frequency of alleles change if the pollinators in the area all died?
DIs there another way to calculate the frequencies of the alleles in this population?

Verified Answer :

  • The observed data shows a steady, directional change in allele frequencies, indicating a deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
  • A scientific inquiry into this shift should investigate the evolutionary mechanisms causing it, such as natural selection or non-random mating.
  • The question 'Would the frequency of alleles change if the pollinators in the area all died?' is the only option that proposes testing an environmental factor as a potential driver of this change.
  • Final answer: \(\boxed{\text{Would the frequency of alleles change if the pollinators in the area all died?}}\)

Explanation

  1. Analyze the observed data and Hardy-Weinberg principle

The data provided shows a clear, directional change in allele frequencies over three generations. The frequency of the dominant allele \(p\) increases from \(0.6\) to \(0.8\), while the frequency of the recessive allele \(q\) decreases from \(0.4\) to \(0.2\). According to the Hardy-Weinberg principle, allele frequencies in a population remain constant over time if the population is large, mates randomly, and is free from mutation, migration, and natural selection. Since we observe a significant shift, we know that at least one of these assumptions is not met in this population.

  1. Evaluate the proposed scientific questions

To determine which scientific question is most appropriate, we evaluate the provided options:

  1. 'Which population most likely experienced a genetic mutation?' Mutations are typically rare and unlikely to cause such consistent, directional, and rapid changes in frequency.
  2. 'Why do some pea plants have purple flowers and others have white flowers?' This is explained by the fundamental understanding of dominant and recessive alleles, which is already established information.
  3. 'Would the frequency of alleles change if the pollinators in the area all died?' This question probes the role of external factors, such as selective pressure or non-random mating, which are major drivers of evolutionary change and can directly lead to the observed shifts in allele frequencies.
  4. 'Is there another way to calculate the frequencies of the alleles in this population?' This focuses on the method of calculation rather than the biological cause of the observed phenomenon.
  1. Identify the most logical scientific inquiry

The observation of changing allele frequencies suggests that evolutionary forces are at work. A scientist would naturally look for the mechanisms driving this change. Investigating whether environmental changes—such as the loss of pollinators—would impact allele frequencies is a logical experimental or observational step to identify the causes of the deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Therefore, this question addresses the fundamental nature of the observed change.

  1. Conclusion and final answer

The most logical question a scientist would ask based on the observed trend is 'Would the frequency of alleles change if the pollinators in the area all died?', as it directly relates the observed shift to potential evolutionary mechanisms like natural selection or changes in mating patterns.

The final answer is: \(\boxed{\text{Would the frequency of alleles change if the pollinators in the area all died?}}\)

Examples

This logic is used by evolutionary biologists to study how environmental factors influence population genetics. For example, if a researcher notices that a certain bird species' beak size changes over years, they might hypothesize that drought conditions are acting as a selective pressure, similar to how changing flower color frequencies might lead a scientist to investigate the role of pollinators. By testing these conditions, we gain insight into the mechanisms that drive adaptation and biodiversity in nature.