If a person in a wheelchair, who actually did push the victim off of the cliff, were accused of pushing a much stronger and healthier person to his death and made the following argument, what would you call the argument?



"How could I, a weak person in a wheelchair, possibly push such a large, strong man off of that cliff? Wouldn't I be afraid he would step out of the way and let me fall to my death? Why wouldn't I just use a gun if I were really going to do such a thing?"


ACertainty
BProbability
CPossibility
DEffective refutation

Verified Answer :

Final answer:

The argument is best described as an effective refutation, challenging the plausibility of the accused scenario based on physical limitations. It raises questions of both possibility and probability, emphasizing the challenges faced by the individual in a wheelchair. Thus, it presents a comprehensive challenge to the accusation based on the circumstances presented.


Explanation:

Understanding the Argument in Legal Terminology

The argument presented by the person in the wheelchair can be categorized as an effective refutation. This type of argument seeks to challenge the validity of the accusation against them by illustrating the implausibility of the act of pushing a much stronger individual off a cliff, considering their own physical limitations. The person raises a valid point that questions both the possibility and probability of such an event happening, focusing on the fear of falling due to the strength difference.

Analysis of the Argument

  1. The individual emphasizes their physical weakness and the lack of likelihood that a strong person would allow themselves to be pushed without resistance.
  2. They suggest an alternative method (using a gun), further reinforcing their stance that physically pushing someone off a cliff is unlikely and risky for them.
  3. By doing this, they effectively undermine the prosecution's argument by questioning how feasible it is for a person in their situation to commit the act in question.

Learn more about Argument Analysis here:

https://brainly.com/question/47805852