What is the essential difference between consequentialist and deontological approaches to normative ethics?

Pick the most accurate answer.

ADeontological approaches emphasize the intrinsic rightness and wrongness of actions, asking whether they do or do not conform to correct moral principles, whereas the consequentialists emphasize the good and bad effects of actions.
BConsequentialist approaches look at the character and intentions of the person performing the actions, while the deontologist only cares about the actions the person performs and disregards the intentions of the agent as irrelevant.
CDeontologists deconstruct the ontology of an ethical issue, while the consequentialists are against the use of sequences in ethical reasoning.
DThe consequentialists hold that virtue is a mean between the extremes of excess and deficiency in emotions; the deontologists are moral nihilists.

The main difference between consequentialist and deontological ethical approaches is that consequentialists focus on the outcomes of actions to determine their morality, whereas deontologists emphasize the intrinsic rightness or wrongness of the actions themselves, independent of their consequences.

Explanation:

Understanding Normative Ethics: Consequentialism vs Deontology

The essential difference between consequentialist and deontological approaches to normative ethics lies in their focus on the morality of actions.

Consequentialism

Consequentialists emphasize the outcomes of actions, arguing that the rightness or wrongness of an action depends on its consequences. For example, in a situation where lying could save a life, a consequentialist would consider the act of lying to be right because the outcome (saving a life) is deemed more important than the act itself.

Deontology

In contrast, deontological approaches focus on the intrinsic rightness or wrongness of actions themselves, independent of their consequences. Deontologists believe that certain actions are morally obligatory, regardless of the outcomes they produce. For instance, a deontologist would argue that lying is always wrong, even if it leads to positive consequences, because it violates a moral rule.

Ultimately, the key distinction is that deontologists adhere to moral principles that govern actions, while consequentialists look at the results produced by those actions.

Learn more about ethics here:

https://brainly.com/question/51485024