Final answer:
The National Rifle Association would submit its brief in support of super PACs to the Supreme Court as it is the body that rules on constitutional matters such as campaign finance. This action reflects the Supreme Court's significant role in upholding or overturning laws related to political expression. Understanding interest group lobbying is crucial in contexts like the Citizens United case.
Explanation:
Understanding Lobbying and Super PACs
The question pertains to the role of interest groups, specifically the National Rifle Association (NRA), in supporting political actions and court cases such as Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. In this landmark case, the Supreme Court ruled that government restrictions on independent expenditures for political communications by corporations and unions violated the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech.
In the context of this ruling, the NRA, along with other interest groups, would likely submit a brief supporting the establishment of super PACs to the Supreme Court. This is because the Supreme Court is the ultimate judicial authority that interprets the constitutionality of laws and regulations regarding campaign financing.
While the Office of the President as well as both the Senate and the House of Representatives are significant parts of the federal government, they do not have the jurisdiction to decide legal cases, which is the core function of the Supreme Court.
Learn more about lobbying here:
https://brainly.com/question/51575698