Final answer:
The Anti-Imperialist League opposed expansionism during the Spanish-American War, believing it contradicted American values of freedom and self-determination. They argued that such imperialism imposed U.S. dominance over other nations. Thus, the League's stance was fundamentally against the idea of America exerting control over other territories.
Explanation:
Understanding the Anti-Imperialist League's Stance
The stance of the Anti-Imperialist League during the period surrounding the Spanish-American War was primarily focused on the belief that expansionism was fundamentally against American values and principles.
Members of the league argued that expansionism imposed U.S. dominance over other nations, especially in the case of territories acquired from Spain, like the Philippines, Puerto Rico, and Guam. They believed this contradicted the very ideals of freedom and self-determination that the United States championed in its own struggle for independence.
The statement options presented do not accurately reflect the league's viewpoint. The Anti-Imperialist League did not argue that expansionism reduced immigration, nor did they claim it violated the Treaty of Paris. Instead, they posited that imperialism was a way for America to exert control, which could ultimately lead to conflicts and the erosion of American democracy.
Conclusion
In summary, the best explanation of the Anti-Imperialist League's stance is that they viewed expansionism as a threat to American democratic values and opposed it on ethical grounds, emphasizing that it was contrary to the principles of liberty.
Learn more about Anti-Imperialist League here:
https://brainly.com/question/29547737