Answered

Griswold vs Connecticut on what did justice Goldberg base his concurring opinion

AThe protection granted by the constitution
BThe intention of the writers of the Constitution
CC list of Rights in the first eight amendments
DThe Human Rights safe from government intervention

Verified Answer :

DamarisD

On the Griswold vs Connecticut case, justice Goldberg based his concurring opinion on the protection granted by the constitution because a cornstack law prohibited any use of medicinal article or instrument that prevented conception in Connecticut in 1965.

francocanacari

Answer:

The correct answer is A. Justice Goldber based his concurring opinion in the protection granted by the Constitution to the rights of people.

Explanation:

Griswold v. Connecticut was a major court decision in the United States. The Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution protects the right to privacy. The ruling concerned a state law in Connecticut called Comstock Law that prohibited anyone from using "drugs, medical items or instruments to prevent conception". By a vote of seven votes to two, the Supreme Court invalidated this law by considering that it violated the right to marital intimacy.

In 1961, Estelle Griswold and C. Lee Buxton opened a family planning center that welcomed many young women. They were sued by the state of Connecticut for violating the Comstock Law, which prohibited the delivery of any substance or material that may prevent fertilization. They were fined $ 100 each. Estelle Griswold appealed the decision of the Connecticut court to the Supreme Court, which in 1965 rendered a judgment in its favor, explaining that the Comstock Law violated the 5th, 9th and 14th amendments.

Justice Arthur Goldbert wielded a concurrent opinion based on the 9th Amendment and the protection it gives to the right to privacy.

Related Questions