A plaintiff sued a restaurant after getting a bone caught in
her throat while eating a fish entree. What was the result?
O That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied
warranty of merchantability.
O That the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not
a foreign substance to the fish.
That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied
warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
That the plaintiff could recover based on an express warranty.
her throat while eating a fish entree. What was the result?
O That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied
warranty of merchantability.
O That the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not
a foreign substance to the fish.
That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied
warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
That the plaintiff could recover based on an express warranty.