Which statement accurately describes a key difference between Simón Bolívar and José de San Martín?

ASan Martín believed in nonviolent resistance to colonial rule, while Bolívar preferred a violent revolution.

BBolívar fought to preserve Spanish rule over Peru, while San Martín fought against the Spanish.

CBolívar declared himself emperor of Venezuela, while San Martín tried to make Venezuela a democracy.

DSan Martín led early revolts against Spanish rule in Peru, while Bolívar liberated the entire country.

San Martin and Bolivar are the principal names of the liberators of Spanish America. These men had plans, however, completely different for the longer term of the countries. San Martin fought for the formation of own monarchies, ruled by European princes invited by the countries. the concept was to facilitate diplomatic recognition. Bolivar, on the opposite hand, had as its objective to make a huge federation republic in all of America, because it was realized within the USA.

DodieZollner DodieZollner · Answer 2 · 2019-11-28T06:23:07-05:00

Answer:

Option: D. San Martín led early revolts against Spanish rule in Peru, while Bolívar liberated the entire country.

Explanation:

The central figures of the South American wars of independence were José de San Martín in the south and Simon Bolivar in the north.

José de San Martín was a liberator who performed a vital role in bringing independence to several South American colonies from the Spanish Empire.

Simón Bolívar became a revolutionary leader in South America during the independence war. He endeavors to free colonies from the Spanish Empire. Bolivar unites small colonies together he won from Spain and creates one nation called Gran Colombia. Those countries were Venezuela, Colombia, Panama, Ecuador, and Peru.