How does justice black support the dissenting opinion?

Aby referring to the waugh v. mississippi university case about protests in fraternities
Bby arguing that all students were at one time required to take german
Cby arguing that the constitution does not have to be obeyed
Dby citing the west virginia v. barnette case about the flag

The State had there passed a law banning understudies from quietly amassing in Greek letter crews and giving that understudies who went along with them could be removed from school. This law would show up superficially to cross paths with the First Amendment's [p523] opportunity of get together provision. The law was attacked as violative of due process and of the privileges and immunities clause, and as a deprivation of property and of liberty under the Fourteenth Amendment.

It was contended that the club made its individuals increasingly moral, showed discipline, and inspired its members to study harder and to obey better the rules of discipline and order

Anonymous Anonymous · Answer 2 · 2019-04-29T08:56:43-04:00

Answer: the correct answer is a. by referring to the waugh v. mississipi university case about protests in fraternities.

Explanation: this case mainly reinforces the idea that the equal protection provision of the Fourteenth Amendment does not forbid classification based on obvious and rational distinctions. The fouteenth Amendment mainly states that no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.