An author claims that "Athletes caught using performance-enhancing drugs should be sentenced to prison." The author provides the following reason as support: In 2013, the TV show Sport-Zone surveyed 2,000 athletes. 73 percent admitted knowing a teammate who took performance-enhancing drugs. Huang Kroll, spokesperson for the International Olympic Committee, was interviewed during the program. "Using illegal substances to gain an advantage is a huge issue," he explained. "Unless stronger laws are passed—laws that result in prison rather than suspension from competition—the problem will continue to grow."


Which choice best describes the reason the author provides?

AIt is effective. It supports the claim clearly and logically.
BIt is irrelevant. It discusses a fact that is off topic and does not support the claim.
CIt is unreliable. It does not give any details to prove that the source can be trusted.
DIt is unverified. It does not cite a source to show where the information was located.

Verified Answer :

A  Becasue it is effective and it supports the claim clearly and logically.

Answer:

It is A

Explanation

1 i did it on flvs

2. it says in the story all the facts about it being efficient such as 73 percent admitted knowing a teammate who took performance-enhancing drugs. Huang Kroll, spokesperson for the International Olympic Committee, was interviewed during the program.