Answered

The federal government approves additional funding for food resources in Africa. Which of the following would be a potential negative externality for the global environment?


Demands on food resources in Africa increase

Incidents of starvation-related illness decrease

Local economies benefit from increasing number of aid workers

Other countries follow suit and shifts funds from conservation to food

Verified Answer :

metchelle

The answer to your question would be the second statement. I think that the incidents of starvation-related illness decrease would be a potential negative externality for the global environment. In this case, if the Federal government approved additional funding for food resources in Africa.

240453

B. Incidents of starvation-related illnesses decrease.

Related Questions