liakatell8a
Answered

Which of the following best explains how Gandhi's non-violent protests differed from Thoreau's?

Gandhi's ideas were less likeable than those of Thoreau.

Gandhi marched as a form of protest, while Thoreau simply refused something.

Gandhi needed to be put in jail to become a protester, unlike Thoreau.

Gandhi's protests surrounded a less dividing issue than those of Thoreau.

Verified Answer :

The correct answer for this question is this one: "Gandhi marched as a form of protest, while Thoreau simply refused something." The statement that best explains how Gandhi's non-violent protests differed from Thoreau's is that Gandhi marched as a form of protest, while Thoreau simply refused something.

jayzaragoza2

Answer:

Gandhi marched as a form of protest, while Thoreau simply refused something.

Explanation:

Thoreau's philosophy of civil disobedience influenced the political thoughts of many notable figures as Mahatma Gandhi, Leo Tolstoy and M. L. K. Jr. This matches the statement 'Thoreau simply refused something'.

Thoreau is sometimes referred to as an anarchist. Though "Civil Disobedience" in Mahatma Gandhi's practice seemed to call for improving rather than abolishing government. The main difference between the two is that Ghandi was seldom associated with anarchism and he simply marched as a form of protest.

Related Questions